Necrotic Obsession

Tell me what you think... I thought it was rather interesting...I watched the program...[/url]

The filamental structure of all matter sounds logic , when one takes in consideration that the self-organisation of matter uses the concept of strings in biology . Also it would support the theory of self-affinity within the structures of matter .


By the way , the sub-atomic vibration of matter is a factor that appears in many theories dealing with the edges of known physics . - So I - personally - see this as the logical link between all the phenomena that appear as being contradictive to parts of Einsteins theory .

As soon as I saw that subject I KNEW you were going to mention The Elegant Universe hehe

String theory has been around for a while, but I'm not wholly convinced. I especially don't like the "as things get smaller the laws of physics change".

The one thing I DID like however was the idea proposed by...forgot his name...that gravity could be an expression of the intersection of various trans-dimensional matter. THAT is really cool and actually makes a little bit of sense to me.

Then again many of Einstein's theories that we were taught in hs/uni about physics couldn't be proven until quite recently and were also thought rediculous at the time (like the idea that temporal velocity is not constant but varies based on speed).

I personally don't believe in String theory...We had a discussion abuot it in Philosophy...I think the Big Bang is more likely, way mor evidence for it aswell....and if you are religious, it ties in more with Genesis than string theory

No, I think the String Theory is just as logical really, and religion has no place in science in my book.

heh.... i thought you meant me mates band :p

I believe it. It seems to make sense to me. (If i can remember the show i saw it on.. it was years ago..)
I also like how it has the possibility of bringing scientific evidence to Some 'new age' beleifs. (psychic abiities, spirit energy, magick, etc.)

My husband and I watched an educational movie about physics recently, and the two theories are highly compatible. What you said would be akin to saying the Big Bang theory is wrong because you believe in Genesis, the Christian creation story, when, if you give it some thought, Genesis is actually a lyrical way and the Big Bang theory a scientific way to describe the same creation.

What I'm trying to say is: all views are not necessarily incompatible. There are endless ways to describe an apple, and to know (or gno) an apple. Because one person says an apple is red and another that an apple is crunchy and another that an apple is sweet does not mean that two of those people are wrong. There are endless ways to describe and know the universe: artists interpret it one way, writers another, theologians another, and scientists yet another. Yes, some theories (the earth is flat; the sun rotates around the earth) are proven wrong, ultimately. But other theories are built upon, expanded, transmuted, conjoined. Keep an open mind.

Note: Not a Christian.

The world may never know.


and ultimitly is probably only part correct no matter what and only a step to something even more basic that will forever be debated. As the theory nearly suggest in its evidence.

**Moved to Scientific as this is not an anthropological matter**